|
Ironman New Zealand 2005: Coach Mike's Race Report Heading into the race, I was as prepared and relaxed as I ever have been, having my equipment squared away, having a solid race plan, pacing plan, and mental sharpness. My run and swim fitness were at all time bests, or pretty close, and the addition of many cycling hours would hopefully further my past run results. My ‘A’ goals were a sub 1:00 swim (my previous best was 1:02:30), a sub 5:30 bike split (my previous best was 5:31), and run sub 3:30 (my previous best was 3:41). Overall I was looking for about 10:00 race. My previous best was 10:30. My ‘B’ goals were a solid swim and run (sub 1:00 and 3:30) and a steady bike (5:30-5:40). My ‘C’ goal is always to finish, and always finish under 11:00. My actual race ended up at 58:47 swim, 5:46 bike, and 4:05 run. This was my fastest swim by 4 minutes, my slowest bike by 6 minutes, and my slowest run. So, what went wrong? Was it pacing, preparation, nutrition, unachievable goals, or just ‘not my day’?
The swim plan was to get out fast and get in a fast draft. Just like
racing cars, if you can get in a fast slip stream you can really make
time without using as much energy as it would take you alone. I
started in the second row and still allowed myself to get swum over
and bumped off until I just decided to stand my ground and held
onto the same group for the
entire swim. I ended up alone
a few times and drafted about
60% of the swim. I felt very
good in the water. I swam at
an effort of 80% and with
more effort and some faster
feet I think a high 56:xx swim
time would have been
possible. I stood up at 58:28,
crossed the mat at 58:47.
The bike plan was to follow the heart rate monitor, which I hadn’t done in IM race before. This was new to me, but I was willing to try it. My HR goals were to average 133 on the flat sections of the bike on loop 1, and 138 on the 2nd loop. The hills I was going to ride at 140 on the first loop and 145 on the 2nd loop. My actual averages were 132 first loop and 136 2nd loop. I could have held higher averages (and hence higher speeds) but I limited myself with poor race nutrition execution. I rode 2:46 on the 1st loop and 3:00 on the 2nd loop. I was hoping for a more consistent ride, but I made some nutritional mistakes that cost me. The bike leg itself was a good one with a mix of hills and some flat sections where you can really get going. The draft marshals were present and the racers seem to police themselves so I didn’t see much blatant drafting. I felt good on the way out of town to the first turnaround. I let some groups go to keep my HR in check. Without the monitor, I would have pushed to stay with those groups. The big issue was how cold it was on the bike. My plan was to drink the majority of the nutrition on the way to Reparoa because it was downhill and I on the way back I wanted to focus on the climbing back to town. The start of the race was cold and the fluids became very thick. My hands were numb and I couldn’t squeeze the bottles to get the fluid out. I finally was able to get enough fluid out to mix some water in there to thin it. I finished my first bottle at 135 k (86 miles) and took in two bananas. The last 45k (28 miles) is where I picked up the pace and I didn’t take in many calories as I was pushing my HR up. I estimate my total caloric intake on the bike was 2000 calories; which was far below my goal of 3600. |
page two
|